NEW YORK Jurors within the trial of new York Metropolis’s ex-jail guard union boss will begin deliberations Wednesday after a full day of closing arguments Tuesday left them with extensively varying takes on a man who was amongst the town’s powerbrokers for over two many years.
Norman Seabrook, 57, was vilified and praised as prosecutors and defence legal professionals took turns casting their opinions about evidence that emerged over the past two weeks. Seabrook, going through conspiracy and fraud charges, did not testify.
Assistant U.S. Attorney Kan Nawaday mentioned Seabrook was greedy and eager to get between $one hundred,000 and $one hundred fifty,000 in kickbacks yearly by steering millions of dollars from the brand new York Metropolis Correction Officers’ Benevolent Affiliation to a hedge fund. The affiliation is the nation’s largest municipal jail guard union.
He said the bribes started with a $60,000 payout delivered by the federal government’s star witness, Jona Rechnitz, in a black $1,000 Ferragamo bag that Nawaday held up for jurors to see.
Defence lawyer Paul Shechtman tried to mock the prosecutor’s presentation when he took his flip earlier than the jury box, holding up the bag as well however with totally different intent.
“For those who imagine this story, he is shorting Norman Seabrook $forty,000, maybe shorting him $90,000,” Shechtman mentioned of Rechnitz.
Then he advised that Rechnitz thought to himself: “You understand what, I know what is going to make him joyful. I can give him a man purse!”
The quip set off laugher around the courtroom, including on the prosecutor’s table. And there was more laugher when Shechtman followed it with: “I know I am shorting him $90,000. But have a look at that!”
Decide Andrew L. Carter Jr. gave a gentle rebuke to spectators to comprise their feelings.
Shechtman started his presentation by praising his consumer’s union work, saying he’d vastly improved the standing of metropolis guards from the mid-1990s till his arrest last year, rising their salaries and benefits bundle considerably.
And he resumed his assaults on the credibility of Rechnitz, saying he had such a nasty character that he was positive nobody on the jury knew anybody with such dangerous intentions.
Nawaday struck again, saying defence attacks in opposition to Rechnitz was “noise” designed to distract them. He urged them to “focus solely on the information” to convict Seabrook and his co-defendant, Murray Huberfeld, a hedge fund financier who authorities say helped arrange the bribe. Huberfeld’s lawyer urged jurors to acquit his client.